Intuitively feel the SEO internal link restructuring: jev
Ran a Jev vs Opus5 comparison on SEO internal linking, where Jev placed 584 links and rejected 139 in 45 seconds for $0.21.
The original post, translated
Intuitively feel the SEO internal link restructuring: jev pk opus5 Jev completed a full-site restructuring in 45.1 seconds, successfully placed 584 highly relevant internal links, and rejected 139 invalid pages that were forced in, with a total cost of $0.21. By comparison, opus5 only processed 21 pages in the same time.
Show the original post in its source language ▾
直观感受下 seo 内链重构：jev pk opus5 Jev 在 45.1 秒内完成了全站重构，成功放置 584 个高相关性内链，并拒绝了 139 个强行凑数的无效页面，总耗费 $0.21。 作为对比，opus5 相同时间只处理了 21 个页面。
The post above is a machine translation from zh; the untranslated text is in the fold-out.
Engagement when collected
Numbers are a snapshot taken from X when the case was added to the library (schema v1, collected 2026-09-19); they will not match today.
Where this case fits
Filed under general Jev builds. In the pattern Jev is built for, the model answers a bounded question per step — and ordinary code acts on the answer, because the answer is already a value rather than a paragraph. Browse the full case library for the work it sits next to.
Keep browsing: all 1173 Jev cases · more from @ai_xiaomu · builders · what Jev is
Last updated: 2026-09-22 · sources & corrections · every card links to its author's original post