First look at the original post and the related discussion
Checked the original Jev/Kev thread before replying, questioning how thresholds filter low scores and whether missed deals cost more than hallucinations.
The original post, translated
First look at the original post and the related discussion, confirm Jev/Kev's specific wording before writing a reply. I believe it runs fast, but how the threshold is set is the real pitfall. Cutting off low scores directly and missing the few that could have closed a deal may be more expensive than hallucinating a reason.
Show the original post in its source language ▾
先看原帖和相关讨论，确认 Jev/Kev 的具体说法再写回复。跑得快我信，阈值怎么卡才是坑。低分直接刷掉，漏掉能成交的那几个，可能比幻觉编个理由更贵。
The post above is a machine translation from zh; the untranslated text is in the fold-out.
Engagement when collected
Numbers are a snapshot taken from X when the case was added to the library (schema v1, collected 2026-09-19); they will not match today.
Where this case fits
Filed under general Jev builds. In the pattern Jev is built for, the model answers a bounded question per step — and ordinary code acts on the answer, because the answer is already a value rather than a paragraph. Browse the full case library for the work it sits next to.
Keep browsing: all 1173 Jev cases · more from @bytelee_trade · builders · what Jev is
Last updated: 2026-09-22 · sources & corrections · every card links to its author's original post