got Jev to review my PRs.
Ran diffs through one Jev call returning 14 typed probability checks, turning them into BLOCK, review, nits, or merge verdicts at $0.00007 per PR.
The original post
got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second
6 real PRs in the video. $0.00007 each. 1,000 PRs = 7 cents vs ~$14.50 on Opus 5
paste a diff → ONE call to @typesafeai → 14 typed checks come back as probabilities:
hardcoded secret, sql injection, touches auth, deletes tests, breaks api, migration, debug leftovers, does the description actually match the diff, blast radius, reviewer effort…
code turns that into a verdict: BLOCK / security review / nits / merge. anything a critical check isn't sure about (0.35–0.65) gets escalated to a human or a big model instead of guessed
Engagement when collected
Numbers are a snapshot taken from X when the case was added to the library (schema v1, collected 2026-09-19); they will not match today.
Where this case fits
Filed under coding & developer tools, video, animation & media, support & operations. In the pattern Jev is built for, the model answers a bounded question per step — and ordinary code acts on the answer, because the answer is already a value rather than a paragraph. Other posts in the same family are on the coding & developer tools page.
Related Jev cases
I got a rubik's cube to solve itself with @typesafeai 's
Dev toolsVideo & media
Breaking: Browser Use + Jev = Ultrafast Findings flights
AgentsBrowser agents
The gains aren’t free: Jev can't generate text Comparing
Dev toolsClassification
Here's a 45-second TL;DR on Jev.
Video & media
Keep browsing: all 1173 Jev cases · more from @redp314 · builders · what Jev is
Last updated: 2026-09-22 · sources & corrections · every card links to its author's original post