You should place more importance on the reason why Jev's

@tukiyomiiori 月読いおり 🧠 · Sep 19, 2026 · case #985008 · listed via Jev Hub

Argued that Jev's typed answers matter because they are meant to be processed programmatically in scripts, steps, or agent decisions rather than used as raw text.

The original post, translated

You should place more importance on the reason why Jev's answers are type-safe. In other words, it is assumed that the answers are not used by just blurting them out, but are used by processing them programmatically. You may process multiple pieces of data with a script, process them in steps, or throw the answers themselves to an agent and have it make judgments.

Show the original post in its source language ▾

jev の回答がtypeSafeな理由をもっと重要視したほうがよい。つまり、回答をポン出しで利用するのではなく、回答をプログラミング的に処理して利用することが前提となっている。複数のデータをScriptで処理しても良いし、ステップで処理しても、回答自体をAgentに投げて判断させても良い。

The post above is a machine translation from ja; the untranslated text is in the fold-out.

Engagement when collected

Likes4

Bookmarks0

Reposts0

Replies0

Quotes0

Numbers are a snapshot taken from X when the case was added to the library (schema v1, collected 2026-09-19); they will not match today.

Where this case fits

Filed under agents & workflows. In the pattern Jev is built for, the model answers a bounded question per step — and ordinary code acts on the answer, because the answer is already a value rather than a paragraph. Other posts in the same family are on the agents & workflows page.

🤖 Agents & workflows